英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from FPC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates:

Media 

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new users

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1

  • STEP 1
    STEP 1

STEP 2

  • STEP 2
    STEP 2

STEP 3

  • STEP 3
    STEP 3

STEP 4

  • STEP 4
    STEP 4

STEP 5

  • STEP 5
    STEP 5

STEP 6

  • STEP 6
    STEP 6

STEP 7

  • STEP 7
    STEP 7

STEP 8

  • STEP 8 (last step)
    STEP 8 (last step)

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

File:Schwäbisch Hall - Altstadt - Salinenstraße - Ansicht von NNW (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 13:37:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Schwäbisch Hall

File:Бар-Бургазы. 4 июня 2017 года.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 12:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:04.03 副總統前往花蓮瞭解災害情形及救援進度 - 53629407644.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2025 at 10:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Others
  •  Info created by Shufu Liu, uploaded by 鐵路1, nominated by Yann
  •  Info Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake.
  •  Support Average quality, but can't be taken again, and a lot of wow. -- Yann (talk) 10:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support--🚊。鐵路Railway Talk 11:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose No, definitely not with that problem of perspective, which gives the impression that all the buildings are collapsing, while in fact there is only one in the center. But believe it or not, I was working on a derivative version of this file on my computer to propose a "delist and replace" nomination on en-Wikipedia. In addition to this major problem of perspective, the sky is horribly dotted with many dust spots. The resolution is not great and I'm not sure that, even with these corrections, it can become a FP on Commons. Still, I'm going to upload another version soon, so you can compare. To finish, I'm not sure the file name, that translates into "04.03 The Vice President went to Hualien to learn about the disaster situation and rescue progress - 53629407644" really describes the image. I don't think the Vice President is a fireman :-) Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done: File:Rescue workers near the semi-collapsed ten-story Uranus Building on Xuanyuan Road after the 2024 Hualien earthquake.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose this version but would support Basile's version. The perspective problems in this one are the killer. If you're illustrating a collapsing building you really need to aim for realism. With no perspective correction it genuinely looks like all the buildings are damaged and leaning. Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Perspective corrected by Basile Morin

File:Not candid at all with Ms. Yuval Gargir.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 10:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait photograph of Israeli model Yuval Gargir, created during a workshop organized by PhotoFreak.
  • Ultra-realistic AI work? (And there's a similar "abrupt shadow" under the nose). Compare the shadow on the cheek and those ones, there's a huge difference. I don't think it's skin pigmentation either, the surface is too large -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It's a 2012 image taken during a professional workshop (read the technique details in image description). It was probably a mistake to nominate this, but it isn't AI. DGtal (talk) 14:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I read the description but this description doesn't explain this weird shadow. Note that we also meet fake images here sometimes.
It's not AI because we can find other photos associated to this name, on the web. But please also add {{PR}} on the file page.
The odd thing also is that the shadow is on the skin but not on the shirt. It really doesn't look natural to me -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Howlett (Isambard Kingdom Brunel Standing Before the Launching Chains of the Great Eastern), The Metropolitan Museum of Art - restoration1.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 23:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Isambard Kingdom Brunel Standing Before the Launching Chains of the Great Eastern, November 1857
That's a question for the original file uploader. Based on the uploader's contributions, perhaps at the time the source offered a higher resolution scan, so something along those lines, but I don't know. Bammesk (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Bammesk. @Crisco 1492: how do you get so many pixels? -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Basile Morin. The maximum resolution file on the zoomify was larger than the resolution available for download. They seem to have changed their algorithm for zooming since then, but if you compare the zoom at maximum resolution with the copy we have here, theirs actually goes even bigger. Now, whether that means they were drawing from a higher resolution file that isn't shared, or their zoom mechanism allows going past 100%, I don't know. All of my Met uploads from the period were at the highest resolution available in zoomify. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the answer. The restoration work is in my opinion very good. But not sure all these pixels are "real" / useful -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Excellent photograph and restoration. While I understand Basile's concerns, looking at the chain on his watch and the brim of his hat this appears to be reasonably sharp for the age at the current resolution. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skradinski buk waterfall – NP Krka – 2016.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 17:29:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skradinski buk waterfall

File:Bateau à vapeur Rhone à aubes Belle Époque Rhône sur le lac Leman en Suisse.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 16:33:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Rhone paddle steamer (1927).

File:Santa Capilla, París, Francia, 2022-11-01, DD 80-82 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 12:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sainte-Chapelle, Paris, France

File:Walk Off the Earth performing at Caesars Windsor, 2025-01-03 31.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 11:51:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canadian singer Sarah Blackwood performing with Walk Off the Earth, 2025-01-06

Callionima falcifera mounted specimen

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 09:38:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Male dorsal
    Male dorsal
  • Male ventral
    Male ventral
  • Female dorsal
    Female dorsal
  • Female ventral
    Female ventral

File:Black-naped Monarch 0A2A8267.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 07:56:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-naped Monarch (Hypothymis azurea prophata) in Trusmadi Forest Reserve, Malaysia.

File:The Kaaba during Hajj (edited).jpg (delist)

Visit the nomination page.

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 06:43:09

 Info: Reasons to delist:

  • Wrong nomination and upload made by Aliphotography sockpuppet of indef blocked user ArionStar. See the original nomination here;
  • High compression rate and quality reduced (only 5.76 MB instead of 21.09 MB for the new version);
  • Non standard profile "Display P3" instead of the original "sRGB IEC61966-2.1".

Technical improvements made from the original photo taken by Adli Wahid, in addition to the consensual crop suggested by Fernando and SHB2000:

  • Tilt fixed, perspective improved in accordance with COM:I (check the left side of the Kaaba and the pillar on the right side of the picture for example);
  • Chromatic aberration reduced / removed around the light spots;
  • Minor noise reduction made with Topaz Denoise AI;
  • Very slight sharpening (unsharpened version also available in the history of the file page);
  • Improved file page presentation, better categorization, addition of wikisource. (More suggestions welcome);
  • Original profile restored.

Notifications to the previous participants: @Cmao20, SHB2000, Aristeas, BigDom, MZaplotnik, VulcanSphere, Terragio67, Thi, Famberhorst, and Yann: -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lavin, gemeente Zernez. 16-10-2024. (actm.) 06.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2025 at 05:43:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Poster for The Lucky Star (1899) by Dudley Hardy.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 21:48:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Lucky Star

File:Dotonburi River Namba Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 20:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dotonburi River Namba Japan

File:Peace River Valley.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 14:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peace River Valley

File:Kiskatinaw River Bridge.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2025 at 14:28:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kiskatinaw River Bridge

File:Uclamss 1429 b3716 G3047 Marco Albori aka Albert Marco sitting in a stained pinstriped suit.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 20:19:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Albert Marco
My thought is that a lot of people might provide a high quality image of, say, Abraham Lincoln, but we may be the only good source of an image for omeone like Albert Marco. If we ignore minor figures, people studying minor figures have no chance of getting a good image. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, it's not really a "minor figure". Marco Albori, alias Albert Marco gets his own article on Wikipedia, clue that he is certainly a Major bad boy :-)
To be frank, at the beginning I thought it was an artist with painting on his suit (like Niels Shoe Meulman for example). But actually it might rather be blood? Basile Morin (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:European hamster (Cricetus cricetus) Meidling 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 20:03:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European hamster (Cricetus cricetus)

File:Red-crowned woodpecker (Melanerpes rubricapillus rubricapillus) male Las Tangaras.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 19:18:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-crowned woodpecker (male)

File:Khotyn Fortress RB.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 19:01:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Khotyn Fortress, Ukraine

File:017 Greater flamingo drinking in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 13:42:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Greater flamingo drinking in the Camargue

File:Great kiskadee (70240).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 13:38:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Great kiskadee in the rain

File:Pont Besalú 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 08:11:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Perspective of columns Inside the Garbhagriha of Shri Ananthashayana Temple.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 04:55:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Perspective of columns Inside the Garbhagriha of Shri Ananthashayana Temple

File:Water reflection of Donggung Palace in Wolji Pond at blue hour in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2025 at 03:10:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water reflection of Donggung Palace in Wolji Pond at blue hour in Gyeongju South Korea

File:Grass snake (Natrix natrix) Pieniny.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2025 at 21:10:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Anémona (Macrodactyla doreensis), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-24, DD 178.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2025 at 10:02:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Corkscrew tentacle sea anemone (Macrodactyla doreensis), Anilao, Philippines

File:Magdalensberg Wanderweg Nr. 106 Wiese 17122024 5776.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 18:43:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alpine pasture on hiking trail #106 in Magdalensberg, market town Magdalensberg, district Klagenfurt Land, Carinthia, Austria, EU

File:Dolina-dolnej-wisly-2.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 17:15:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lower Vistula Valley in Poland

File:Hoar frost on trees along Myrstigen 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 17:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hoar frost on trees along Myrstigen, Sweden.

File:033 Saddle-billed stork landing in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 17:14:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saddle-billed stork landing in the Serengeti National Park

File:Чайкинский.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 15:53:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Architectural monument, railway tunnel No. 13, Slyudyansky District

File:Церковь Преображения Господня, Ижма фото 13.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 15:55:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Architectural monument, Izhma Pogost

File:Oriental hanging lanterns. Souk Haddadine, Marrakech Medina (سوق الحدادين مراكش).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 13:49:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oriental hanging lanterns. Souk Haddadine, Marrakech Medina (سوق الحدادين مراكش)

File:Wisła pod Ochodzą w województwie małopolskim, 20231119 0706 2690.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 13:06:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vistula river valley in the early morning near Ochodza, Lesser Poland Voivodeship

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 12:19:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Great St. Martin Church and Cologne Cathedral seen from the Deutz Bridge
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2025 at 05:45:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Cmao20 (talk) 14:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Mycenaceae

File:Vintage Smile.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2025 at 21:13:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moriones Lenten Rites (Marinduque, Philippines). Men & women wearing the Roman soldier masks are the Moriones. The name comes from the Morion helmets, which were worn in 16th and 17th century Spain.

File:Ginkgo-Blatt -- 2024 -- 6855.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2025 at 13:25:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photo art – Series "Miracles of nature" – based on a yellow ginkgo leaf

File:Telefontornet 1890.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2025 at 01:42:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Telefontornet in Stockholm, 1890.
This version was rightly FPX-ed by Basile due to low resolution (although it's cleaned up a bit and perspective corrected), but since this is a rather famous photo in Sweden, I've taken the liberty to add the original as an alt. It's large enough, but may require some restoration. I'll leave it up to voters here to review this, please revert if you want. --Cart (talk) 13:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

@W.carter, thanks so much for saving my nomination and even bringing up a bettered version. ;D -- LucaLindholm (talk) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yann: I totally agree that overprocessing of historic(al) photographs is a bad thing – drastic changes of white balance or gradation, sharpening, even removal of original film grain may all be considered harmful. However the little black stains in this photo look exactly like the typical little dirt spots (often fly droppings) which I have often seen on old prints, and cloning them out would IMHO restore the original appearance of the photo without reducing its historical value. If we want to keep a photo 100% authentic (reproducing the current state of a concrete negative, slide or print), we should not even rotate and crop it; if we do the latter, we have have already moved on from 100% authenticity to a slightly restored version, and then it also seems avisable to remove obvious dirt and scratches, too. – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Thu 02 Jan → Tue 07 Jan
Fri 03 Jan → Wed 08 Jan
Sat 04 Jan → Thu 09 Jan
Sun 05 Jan → Fri 10 Jan
Mon 06 Jan → Sat 11 Jan
Tue 07 Jan → Sun 12 Jan

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Sun 29 Dec → Tue 07 Jan
Mon 30 Dec → Wed 08 Jan
Tue 31 Dec → Thu 09 Jan
Wed 01 Jan → Fri 10 Jan
Thu 02 Jan → Sat 11 Jan
Fri 03 Jan → Sun 12 Jan
Sat 04 Jan → Mon 13 Jan
Sun 05 Jan → Tue 14 Jan
Mon 06 Jan → Wed 15 Jan
Tue 07 Jan → Thu 16 Jan

The bot

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2025.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=968619817"