Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 17:48:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 17:24:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Others
- Info created by Maddy Makes Games – uploaded by Czar – nominated by Di -- Di (they-them) (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Di (they-them) (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 12:47:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#South Korea
- Info created by Cultural Heritage Administration - uploaded by Takuyakoz – nominated by Sadopaul -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 12:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 12:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Korean Bliss ;-) -- -donald- (talk) 13:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition, but sharpness low and a lot of CAs. --XRay 💬 14:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 12:09:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
- Info created by Cultural Heritage Administration – uploaded by Sadopaul – nominated by Sadopaul -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 12:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 12:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No WOW factor for me. It's a rather simple depiction of an old door. --Gnosis (talk) 16:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2024 at 05:56:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
- Info Tree stump next to path along the mountain stream Brancla. Beautifully shaped dead tree stump surrounded by soft autumn colours invites you to sit on it for a while.
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a decent photo, but the lighting is flat(ish), lacks the wow factor. Especially compared to your many FP which are stunning. I believe the full crop of the photo is better.--Tupungato (talk) 11:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Tupungato. The full view is very much better than the trail, but also there the crop is too tight, since the tops of the trees are cut, and the border of the photograph is too close to the summit of the mountain. Very nice colors. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Tupungato: and @Harlock81: Thanks for your comments. I re-edited the photo, maybe this is a better representation.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 21:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info View of the fields from Julio Andrade, Carchi Province, Ecuador. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Massive resolution, spectacular landscape, intersting sky.--Tupungato (talk) 11:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There is a white line horizontally across the entire panorama (see annotation) --Llez (talk) 15:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support because I'm sure you will fix the problem Llez notes Cmao20 (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 21:32:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
- Info Exterior of the Saint Cecil Cathedral (Cathédrale Sainte-Cécile) in Albi, France. The grim exterior of this resembles a fortress, but the interior is lavishly decorated with art and sculpture as you can appreciate in the choir. The UNESCO World Heritage Site was built between 1282 and 1480 in Southern French Gothic style. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Amazing place and good composition but you were pretty unlucky with the light Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 21:11:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2000-2009
- Info created by Carol M. Highsmith, restored by YitzhakNat and Bammesk, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Yann
- Info World Trade Center towers, New York, 2 months before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 21:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It has terrible blue tint, and the restoration made it even worse. Here is my quick correction to show more or less what the colors should be (it's not good, but it's the right direction).--Tupungato (talk) 11:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @YitzhakNat, Bammesk, and Crisco 1492: Please comment. Yann (talk) 17:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- The original also has vignetting. I embedded an RGB profile in the existing restoration, which resulted in the thumbnail and full size corresponding; I cannot speak to the source of the blue tint. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Looks also like vignetting --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- Support I think that Tupungato has a point, so I made a new version, correcting the blue tint. I also think that Adobe color profile is not the best for the web. Yann (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492, Tupungato, and PantheraLeo1359531: FYI. Yann (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Allegory of the Four Seasons
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 15:57:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Spring
-
Summer
-
Autumn
-
Winter
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
- Info Allegory of the four seasons in the form of putti, castle park Quedlinburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great set! --Yann (talk) 16:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colours, light, angles, subject, all great. Excellent set. Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rolf Kranz (talk) 21:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A valid set on FPC, almost a reason to support :) On the other side I don't see what is extraordinary here and the detail is not the best. Do these statues have any historic value? I don't find the statues specially pretty or rich, either. Poco a poco (talk) 14:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2024 at 15:21:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais
- Info Yes I know that the plants in the foreground are out of focus but I don't think it spoils the totality of the composition. A fresh take on the Matterhorn from an angle I hadn't seen before. Good quality and very high resolution. created by Roy Egloff – uploaded by Roy Egloff – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Fernando (talk) 15:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Huge resolution and the mountain is conveniently positioned in a gap between two trees -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:17, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support —-Llez (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 21:03:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Telescopes / Telescope RC600 of the Caucasian mountain observatory SAI Moscow State University
- Info created by Nerenisa – uploaded by Nerenisa – nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and interesting Cmao20 (talk) 15:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 15:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 16:51, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing. Wolverine X-eye 17:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:29, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tupungato (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Tilted/Lacks perspective correction aber otherwise great Poco a poco (talk) 14:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support —-Llez (talk) 16:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 20:52:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District / Sea of Okhotsk. Iturup Island.
- Info created by Ted.ns – uploaded by Ted.ns – nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very dramatic but I'm not sure how realistic it is, and the vignetting is noticeable for me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose As per Cmao, perhaps a bit too overworked and slightly tilted if I'm seeing correctly. --Fernando (talk) 16:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 11:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
- Info Coneflower (Rudbeckia) with hoarfrost. All by me. -- Ermell (talk) 11:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 11:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rolf Kranz (talk) 06:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus stacking, and here the hoar frost is word-for-word the icing on the cake ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 11:24:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_snow_sports
- Info created by Granada – uploaded by Granada – nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 11:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I gave this nomination a lot of thought. The athlete is not perfectly sharp, but the photo resolution is big enough for this to not be an issue. The image greatly showcases the dynamics of cross-country finish line "reach out" technique, while having a nice overall composition and good setting without visual clutter (it's hard to have a sporting event image without ever present advertising posters etc). I had a look at hundreds of cross-country photos in Commons and this is one of the best.-- Tupungato (talk) 11:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent photo. Not really seeing any sharpness issue. Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you @Tupungato very much for the nomination! --Granada (talk) 10:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent viewpoint, nice light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Rolf Kranz (talk) 11:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 10:21:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Soldiers
- Info created by NASA/Bill Ingalls – uploaded by Ras67 – nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 10:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the dynamism, composition, unique journalistic value. Roskosmos blanket and Soyuz capsule in background are nice touches. I'm aware of chromatic aberration, but support this photo nonetheless. -- Tupungato (talk) 10:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support CA is pretty minor, honestly Cmao20 (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 11:11:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Others
- Info High-speed photography - Friction of a match. Created by Yann SEGALEN – uploaded by Yann SEGALEN – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 11:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 11:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 11:27, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Fascinating, but it is the match going to burn? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very impressive. --Yann (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:50, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 21:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 10:41:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
- Info created & uploaded by Michielverbeek – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's a nice photo, but I'm missing the "wow factor", some additional uniqueness. -- Tupungato (talk) 11:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support for me the wow is in the composition with the cyclists providing a sense of dynamism, the nice light, and the interesting architecture. Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 09:42:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Gygis
- Info No FPs of this genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It definitely needs to be brighter. The bright areas of feathers are between 220 and 230 RGB at highest. This should be corrected to higher levels, around 245-250. -- Tupungato (talk) 11:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yes @Tupungato: , I have increased brightness. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- I would make it even brighter. I looked at the whole thing again and noticed more issues. I added four notes to the image: 2 dust spots, white "ghost" artefacting below the bill/head, and strange patterns in the sky. I especially see the strange patterns in the sky, when trying to brighten the photo to see how it looks. I don't know what's going on there. Was there some serious Clone Brushing / Clone Stamping editing there? Sorry for being so picky. I'm a fellow birdwatcher and it's a better photo than I have ever taken of any moving bird, but still I feel it needs to be slightly better. Tupungato (talk) 12:56, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Have removed the dust spot. Can't see much else wrong actually... Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yes @Tupungato: , I have increased brightness. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful simple composition – the bird is exactly at the right position and in the perfect angle. – Aristeas (talk) 11:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Yes ! Riad Salih (talk) 21:50, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2024 at 06:28:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#South Korea
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, but leaning Weak support – I don't love how my eyes are drawn to the background, which isn't the main subject (the grey heron) and feels rather unsharp, but the foreground is fairly good. That said I'm not sure what can be done about this. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, SHB2000, for your feedback. The background is not spectacular but I find the contrast between natural environment and skyscrapers uncommon compared to what we usually see here. The fact that the park is populated by large birds in total freedom is a local specificity that I find astonishing. As for sharpness, I did my best to optimize it according to the scene including a living being, but perhaps F/13 instead of F/11 would have increased the depth of field. The weather was beautiful that day, and it's a photo I like because it combines two contradictory ideas: nature and urbanization. Like a balance between the two. Landscape connected to megacity, or urbanization with a breath of fresh air in its heart -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nominator, I find the contrast between nature and urban to be compelling and sensitive. Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per others. IMHO especially the reflection is advantageous: it brings the background “into” the foreground and connects the buildings with the heron. – Aristeas (talk) 11:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Normally one expects another background --Llez (talk) 12:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2024 at 20:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info Red Arrows fyling the “Tornado” manoeuvre in evening light at the Duxford Flying Finale 2024. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 20:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 20:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's pretty impressive --Superbass (talk) 21:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support. bravo. --Gnosis (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- SupportCmao20 (talk) 00:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Enjoy the last moments of your planet... But on a documentation level, it's very instructive. Fair composition and good quality. Noticed one vehicle upside down -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:00, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2024 at 14:21:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info Again, a photo that is different to anything else in the gallery so far. created by Byrdyak – uploaded by Byrdyak – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It is a very different composition, but we do already have a yawning lion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Very good photo, Charles. But as you say, yours is a very different composition. Cmao20 (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- And different light. The open mouth also seems wider here -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Useful profile perspective AND good detail quality. (I know how hard it can be to get such a shot when I try so with my cat🐱). Great job --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support that's a great perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20, Basile, PantheraLeo1359531. – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2024 at 04:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
- Info created by NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center – uploaded by A1Cafel – cropped by Zzzs – nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 04:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support There aren't a lot of featured pictures of tropical cyclones, especially ones taken from the International Space Station (ISS). Most ISS photos of tropical cyclones don't show the entirety of the storm's structure, have a perspective distortion (which sometimes makes the image look flat), were taken at an awkward position, or had lots of distracting elements/interior surroundings. I found this image, which I believe could be a featured picture, since the photo contains most, if not all of the tropical cyclone's structure and was taken at a good position. The image cannot be retaken since the storm in the picture no longer exists. This image is used in the tropical cyclone article on the English Wikipedia (the majority of the time being the one that was uncropped before I changed it to the cropped version), so I believe it implies that it is one of the best images of a tropical cyclone taken from the ISS. Although there is another FP, I don't think it is the best since it does not show all of the tropical cyclones and is of inferior quality in terms of resolution and file size. Although some elements are present in this image and could be distracting, they do determine the image's orientation at the time of imaging and make the image appear less artificial. They obscure little of the tropical cyclone and, in my opinion, do not interfere with the significant encyclopaedic value of the image. I mentioned this image in COM:CRIT right here and it was supported by a single person, so I feel it's ready for FPC. --Zzzs (talk) 04:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and I actually like that you can see parts of the ISS Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:25, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 20:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 23:49:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
- Info created by The Metropolitan Museum of Art – uploaded by Gnosis – nominated by Gnosis -- Gnosis (talk) 23:49, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gnosis (talk) 23:49, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The background is too large IMO. A lot of empty space, and the subject in comparison is not huge -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin can crop? --Gnosis (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested crop added (see image note), but only 2700 x 2100 pixels will be too small in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Basile for your recommendation, I ended up cropping the image and is now over 8 million pixels (4 times more than the minimum requirement). Hope this would satisfy other voters. --Gnosis (talk) 01:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested crop added (see image note), but only 2700 x 2100 pixels will be too small in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin can crop? --Gnosis (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Now it works for me. A calm and sensitive photo of a beautiful artwork; the soft gray background is IMHO much more tactful than the strong black background often used with such golden artefacts. – Aristeas (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:15, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. The resolution is not huge but it is very sharp at full size so I think that's fine Cmao20 (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. Valuable museum artwork. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 16:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 21:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 22:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info created by KaiBorgeest – uploaded by KaiBorgeest – nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Harsh light and, IMO, not an extraordinary photograph -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- The top crop is also tight --Poco a poco (talk) 19:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Basile Morin, sorry, but I think this is just too straightforward a presentation and the light is too dull for this subject. QI - and a good quality QI! - but not FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose It's ok, but there is no "wow" factor needed for Featured. --Tupungato (talk) 12:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 17:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A tad oversaturated? The sky looks a bit fake -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Info This photo have been taken after sunset when the sky had enough light and clouds had specific colors after sunset, but the groud was too dark to take one shot and avoid gaps in shadows and highlights. So I had to use HDR to receive balance in light between the sky and the ground. Maybe this can explain your thoughts about fake sky. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with drone pictures taken in low light is that they are not stabilized like a tripod. It's possible that this lack of quality impacted the result when enhancing the colors afterwards in post-treatment -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support It does look a bit too saturated but then again I think autumn trees can look like this at sunset Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose too oversaturated. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: great composition, and the sky looks natural to me, very similar to what I see in Canada in autumn. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The tree on the left spoils the compo IMHO, and yes it looks a bit oversaturated and the WB a bit purpelish Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per SHB2000. --Fernando (talk) 16:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Interesting moment, but left part of the building is hidden, and the colors appear slightly oversaturated. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 14:11:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Daphniidae
- Info created by Janeklass – uploaded by Janeklass – nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 14:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 14:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Note added asking about possible stacking errors. Photographer's choice, but I can see more detail when the image is less dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- There was a small stacking error, yes. I fixed it.
- About the light - In general, I like this kind of light (as you have already seen here many times :) ) Janeklass (talk) 17:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Underexposed in my view. But fixable. I agree with Charles. Once brightened, the image becomes more interesting, revealing fine details and less muted colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree that honestly all these pictures are underexposed but I'm going to keep supporting them because the details are so interesting and they are pretty difficult, unique photos. Cmao20 (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 13:15:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by U.S. Office of War Information, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support In addition to the historical value, I think that the mirror reflection is very well done here. -- Yann (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- An insect photographer (talk) 14:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed a good photo with a clear and creative implementation of the message. – Aristeas (talk) 16:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting self-reference. If it gets seven supports, this picture may be promoted :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
File:JackDelanolocomotiveshop.jpg (delist)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 13:06:52
- Info Nearly identical to File:Chicago and Northwestern railroad locomotive shop fsac.1a34676u.jpg, but in lower resolution. That FPC should have been a Delist and Replace. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Yann (talk) 13:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist --Thi (talk) 15:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Thank you for the delist nomination, Yann! The other version has (besides the higher resolution) also better colours. – Aristeas (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Per above, TY -- (Terragio67) (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist --Harlock81 (talk) 11:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist -- Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist -- Karelj — Preceding undated comment was added at 16:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist --Zzzs (talk) 00:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per others -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delist --SHB2000 (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 08:09:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Delphinidae (Oceanic Dolphins)
- Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The last orca - after which these shows will end.Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Was it a comment to the photo or to anything else, Charlesjsharp? A user from France added to photo a fews weeks ago to https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orque#Captivit%C3%A9 You can like these kinds of shows or not. However, I see no reason why there shouldn't be well-composed and well-done photos of them on Commons. Perhaps you could use the photo in connection with a critical article about orca shows, if you like. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:07, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- No comment on the photo (although the composition is poor, not showing the orca well and obstruction in the foreground); that just that I thought orca shows would have stopped by now. It is more than 30 years after the film Free Willy. I think it's OK to comment on controversial subject at FPC - see this FPC or this one and others featuring children or nudity. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Was it a comment to the photo or to anything else, Charlesjsharp? A user from France added to photo a fews weeks ago to https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orque#Captivit%C3%A9 You can like these kinds of shows or not. However, I see no reason why there shouldn't be well-composed and well-done photos of them on Commons. Perhaps you could use the photo in connection with a critical article about orca shows, if you like. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:07, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 05:47:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Nevada
- Info: Aztec Sandstone outcropping in the Valley of Fire. Second nomination - redeveloped to improve fidelity; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low wow factor, in my view. Rocks in midday light with ordinary sky. Perhaps bottom crop too tight. Also Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire1.jpg, already promoted, is very similar, apparently taken the same day (according to the metadata exif "Date and time of data generation"), and slightly better as part of the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 05:47:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Nevada
- Info: Calico Hills panorama. Photo from 2009, so sharpness is admittedly borderline by modern standards. But I feel it still deserves a star based on light and colours. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It's quite good, but the different color of the sky (see note) is distracting for me. Is it a stitching error? — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done: fixed; it was some sort of artefact indeed, thanks for the note! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with nomination. Quality is okay but composition + light is really good, happy to see this get the star Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The clouds were white at the beginning but now they are blue -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2024 at 01:06:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The juxtaposition of the traditional architecture to the creative chaos of the graffiti and the leaning bicycle makes this scene attractive and charming. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support the composition. --Thi (talk) 10:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:29, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 15:47:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Balaenopteridae (Rorquals)
- Info To explain: the female is 15m long, so the camera is much further away and the water reduces clarity. The calf is the one photographed on its own. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but the water is a little too murky for my liking. Wolverine X-eye 18:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I quite understand the comment. The water isn't strictly speaking murky. It is very clean. The problem is the physics of how light behaves underwater. Have a look online at pictures of humpbacks taken from the same distance that show the whole adult animal in profile, you will see they all look like this. It would be possible to mask the whales in post-processing but that would distort real life. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, and per photographer's explanation for apparent lack of clarity. I think the composition is really good. Cmao20 (talk) 21:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. As looking featured pictures taken in the same conditions, it has good resolution and clarity. Also we see a charming family. --An insect photographer (talk) 23:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose This light was far better, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I was much closer. Less water between camera and subject. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Less water but more photons? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- The views expressed for and against are quite similar to those made over ten years ago when this similar composition was promoted. Should it be delisted? I don't think so. I too have searched for a better image than mine online... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- That image is much more clearer, imo. Wolverine X-eye 20:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes and there are also many great photos of whales + calf online -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- The views expressed for and against are quite similar to those made over ten years ago when this similar composition was promoted. Should it be delisted? I don't think so. I too have searched for a better image than mine online... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is not good here, compo, lighting, detail is in the other one much better. Poco a poco (talk) 12:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20 and An insect photographer. – Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The diffraction of the sunlight under the sea imho adds an interesting feature in the composition, even though paid with a lower definition of the whales. Also, the subject of a mother with her calve is extremely valuable. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 13:34:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
- Info Tadej Pogačar, No.1 ranked UCI cycler. Photo from 2022 Tour of Slovenia. Infobox picture. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 13:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Just a man showing his teeth. What more can I say? Well, nothing except that this image is not doing for me. Wolverine X-eye 18:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is also a bonus por celebrity here Poco a poco (talk) 20:36, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 05:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2024 at 06:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
- Info created by King of Hearts – uploaded by King of Hearts – nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, not convinced here, I see a bit of asymmetry maybe due to difference between natural light at right and artificial light at left or the vanishing point or the windows' position. I don't know how to explain but I'm not fond of the composition, sorry it's not clear why even for me. --An insect photographer (talk) 23:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2024 at 22:06:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by me -- A. Öztas (talk) 22:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- A. Öztas (talk) 22:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not convinced this is as sharp as it could be, but the colours, composition, and mood are just outstanding. Artistically this photo really works for me. Cmao20 (talk) 03:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice thumbnail, but low quality at full resolution. Similar to many other nice pictures we have on Commons, but not "one of the best" in my opinion. The narrow DoF (F/5.6) makes the background blurry, and also the walls. High (2500) ISO reduce the level of detail. Perhaps a tripod would have helped here -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Reasons are similar to Basile's above. Judging from the ISO and timestamp this was taken in low light, yet the WB in the photograph looks like it was shot during the day. Main issue is that the high ISO and subsequent noise reduction have significantly affected the image quality to the extent that it has the appearance of a smartphone image when viewed fullscreen. I agree with Basile that this is nice, but unfortunately not the best of the best. BigDom (talk) 06:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is unfortunately not up to par. Wolverine X-eye 18:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2024 at 17:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Denmark
- Info Kødbyen is a place of companies and activities in Copenhagen (Denmark) related to the meat and food industry, these functions today take up much less space and recently the area has transformed into a new creative cluster with galleries, restaurants, nightlife and small creative activities. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2024 at 14:00:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#Europe
- Info created by European Space Agency: Sentinel-2, uploaded by Up and Go – nominated by Draceane — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting satellite photo with good composition and quality Cmao20 (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:57, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2024 at 13:23:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Only 3000 x 2000 pixels and poor categorization -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Excellent composition and light but per on your other nomination, 6mpx is pretty small and tempers my support. Cmao20 (talk) 02:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not enough wow, sorry, I would have preferred the light coming from the candles, rather than from windows. Also per my comment above. "Bigorski Monastery" is vague. There are many things in this monastery: bells, doors, paintings, church, stairs, etc. A view from outside is also "Monastery". See COM:CAT. This task is part of COM:I, prerequisite for FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20; I actually like the combination of candles with the light/shadow arches from the windows. Basile rightly emphasizes that description and categories should be refined though. – Aristeas (talk) 15:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per Cmao20 and Aristeas --An insect photographer (talk) 23:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2024 at 13:16:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:52, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 19:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think this one stand out from the other great shots you took. Good detail but the right crop is difficult Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Not a big fan of the right crop, but I believe this image can be an exception. --Zzzs (talk) 00:12, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2024 at 11:02:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting and well framed church interior Cmao20 (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20; good light and colours. Left and right crop are a little bit difficult (I guess there was no better solution), but when viewed in full screen mode the image is impressive and appears as a unit. – Aristeas (talk) 15:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, not convinced here, it is cluttered and hard to distinguish the altar from the stained window in the back, also off-centered Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose Beautiful picture, just a detail : on the right there is a yellow object a bit distracting at second glance. Is it possible to cropped it ? If not, it's a no for me because every detail is important for FP, sorry. --An insect photographer (talk) 22:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2024 at 05:31:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info Your rainbow panorama installation by Ólafur Eliasson at the ARoS Aarhus Art Museum, Denmark. c/u/n by GRDN711 -- GRDN711 (talk) 05:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support At the suggestion of another user, have re-cropped this image from the original in a larger size. While still small, IMHO, this image has merit for FP consideration. -- GRDN711 (talk) 05:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support IMHO it works better now; the image is still not big, but meets our minimum requirements, and the new crop has the advantage that it shows how this installation is located between sky and earth. From this perspective the visitors look like a part of the installation. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small compared with current FPC. Such a resolution is acceptable only for something very special, which could not be photographed again. Yann (talk) 11:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great subject but sorry, I do think 862 pixels high is just too small for an FP in 2024. Cmao20 (talk) 02:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yann, Cmao20 - I welcome your opinions but as listed above, the FP resolution requirement is a minimum of 2 MB (and even less with strong mitigating circumstances). If you want to change FP criteria, that argument goes to a different forum. If you judge this image on its own (taken in 2011 when this rainbow panorama was created) and work through the FP critera at the top of the page, I think you will find it meets all, particularly the last one - value in illustrating the intended, interactive use of an architectural work of art by a significant modern artist. IMHO, it has a little wow too. --GRDN711 (talk) 06:28, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- There are many images which would pass in 2011, but not today. We had 10 millions files, and we have now more than 110 M. Sorry, but we can't get back in time. Yann (talk) 09:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, the lower limit is 2 megapixels, but in practice, photos of an easily reproducible subject should be much larger. I would not vote for a picture this size unless either it was a technically difficult photograph or it was very difficult or impossible to replace. And it isn't even that sharp even at this small size. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2024 at 20:21:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info Harvesting at Mount Barton, Devon, England, 1942. Land Girls Joan Day, her sister Ivy, and Iris Andrews help a farmer to transfer stooks of harvested oats into a truck in the sunshine on Hollow Moor, Devon. Artist: Ministry of Information Photo Division Photographer, Wildman Shaw?. This photograph was scanned and released by the Imperial War Museum - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 20:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 20:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting, and good composition, but low resolution. It is possible to get much higher resolution images in this field: File:Fordson tractor with members of British Women's Land Army 1940s.jpg. Yann (talk) 21:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The resolution is indeed low, but we may allow it as this is a historical image, and it is sharp, with good composition and exposure. It’s also interesting as it represents the official interpretation of the Women’s Land Army especially nicely, giving an impression of cheerful cooperation and leaving out the difficulties and trouble. – Aristeas (talk) 15:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 22:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:58, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support (and 7) Cmao20 (talk) 12:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Note: Cropped, minor vibrance adjustment and file type changed to JPG
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2024 at 16:13:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
- Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by -- Don --Don (talk) 20:23, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Don (talk) 20:23, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I really like this now. The crop and the adjustment to the saturation have improved it a lot. Cmao20 (talk) 00:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't really love this composition, to be honest. I feel like there's too wide a space on top.--Peulle (talk) 08:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing to say technically, a very good photo but for me this picture hasn't a woaw effect for FP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by An insect photographer (talk • contribs)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2024 at 15:42:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Poland
- Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Pudelek (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Wonderfully atmospheric and great colours, but a bit small for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Relevant parts of the photo are underexposed, this concerns the gravestones and the tree trunks, where any structure or natural colour is lost in blackness. I recognize the intention to create a gloomy mood, which the picture succeeds in doing. However, in my opinion, this would also be possible without that massive underexposure. As far as I can tell, this is more of a technical issue than a purposeful image design. --Superbass (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support The somewhat sinister atmosphere (suitable for such an old cemetery) appeals to me very much.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:24, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I think that Superbass got a point but the main issue is the resoluation, 6 MPx is nowadays just too low res to me, otherwise nice Poco a poco (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose per Poco a poco --An insect photographer (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice at thumbnail size but at full resolution the narrow depth of field makes the content out of focus. All these blurry leaves are not extraordinary in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco a poco. --Karelj (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sat 07 Dec → Thu 12 Dec Sun 08 Dec → Fri 13 Dec Mon 09 Dec → Sat 14 Dec Tue 10 Dec → Sun 15 Dec Wed 11 Dec → Mon 16 Dec Thu 12 Dec → Tue 17 Dec
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Tue 03 Dec → Thu 12 Dec Wed 04 Dec → Fri 13 Dec Thu 05 Dec → Sat 14 Dec Fri 06 Dec → Sun 15 Dec Sat 07 Dec → Mon 16 Dec Sun 08 Dec → Tue 17 Dec Mon 09 Dec → Wed 18 Dec Tue 10 Dec → Thu 19 Dec Wed 11 Dec → Fri 20 Dec Thu 12 Dec → Sat 21 Dec
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/December 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/December 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/December 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.