Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder

Diese Projektseite in anderen Sprachen:

Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Formalien

Nominierung

Leitsätze für die Nominierung

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

Auflösung – Fotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,92 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.

Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.

Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.

Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.

Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.

Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.

Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.

Wert – unser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
- nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
- Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
- schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.

Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.

Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.

Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.

Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.

Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.

Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.

Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.

Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.

Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.

Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.

Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.

Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.

Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Abstimmung

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

{{Support}} ( Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status),
{{Oppose}} ( Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
{{Neutral}} ( Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
{{Comment}} ( Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
{{Info}} ( Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
{{Question}} ( Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

{{Keep}} Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
{{Delist}} Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:

In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten

Allgemeine Regeln

Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw}} ~~~~.
Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Vor allem sei freundlich

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

Siehe auch

Zum Bearbeiten der Liste mit den Nominierungen klicke auf: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
Eine chronologische Liste ist unter Commons:Featured pictures/chronological zu finden.
Ein Archiv vergangener Nominierungen liegt unter Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.
Eine Anleitung, wie man Nominierungen beendet, findet sich unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Inhaltsübersicht

Exzellenz-Kandidaten

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates

File:Samango monkey (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus) head Mount Sheba.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 19:41:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support You outdid yourself with this one; what a shot! Wolverine XI 19:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Zzzs (talk) 20:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helgumannen August 2020 09.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 09:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Sweden
Info Helgumannen is a fishing station near the nature reserve of Langhammars at Fårö island (Gotland, Sweden). Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too far. Wolverine XI 19:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just some info about this place. Fårö is known worldwide for its stark, desolate and minimalist limestone beaches. This photo captures that perfectly with the simple fishing huts and one lone person. This is where Ingmar Bergman lived and made many of his films. He came to the island when he was scouting for locations, fell in love with the place and stayed the rest of his life. This is about as quintessential Fårö as you can get in a photo. --Cart (talk) 21:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree with Cart. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me, the photo exudes a certain loneliness, partly thanks to the woman on the left.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penutupan Para Asian Games 2018.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 05:04:08

Info created by RaiyaniM - uploaded by RaiyaniM - (Original nomination)

Commons:Featured pictures/Historical

Delist -- There were well-reasoned opposes at the last FPC. I'm not sure how this one got by. Photos need to be sharp! ( Schierbecker (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Yann (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wow > Sharpness. Period. ★ 10:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The wow replaces the quality in this image (I learned the hard way). This is FP, not QI. --Zzzs (talk) 12:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Karelj (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist "Wow"—however you define it—is not everything. Wolverine XI 19:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Zzzs. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GBU-38 munition explosions in Iraq.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 04:48:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by Andy Dunaway/U.S. Army - uploaded and nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- It doesn't get more "danger close" than this. Schierbecker (talk) 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I will not support a photo showing a bombing killing humans. The atrocious images in the news are already unbearable. El Golli Mohamed ^(talk) 12:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that this image was nominated in the first place is mind-boggling. Wolverine XI 19:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with El Golli Mohamed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I know we also have other grizzly images (not linking them now because I want to have a good night's sleep) and stuff, but this is too far. I'm not going to examine the details of this image for quality, but this nomination is unethical. --Zzzs (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The problem of this picture is not the subject. Visit the top prizes of photojournalist competitions in famous newspapers and you will find many striking images of this kind. Also in wildlife. COM:FPC is not a care bears platform, and fortunately we have already promoted several FPs of bombings (example) in the past. But here, the quality, the wow factor and the light are not exceptional in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Basile. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chinese tuin Het Verborgen Rijk van Ming in de Hortus Haren. 19-05-2024. (d.j.b) 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 04:33:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural# Netherlands Groningen.
Info Waterfall. Location, Chinese garden, the Hidden Realm of Ming in the Hortus Haren in the Netherlands. Belichtingstijd 8/1 sec (8) F-getal f/7,1 ISO/ASA-waarde 100
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Numerous chromatic aberrations at the top of the image, but I could be wrong since I'm not a professional. --Zzzs (talk) 12:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. chromatic aberration resolved. Thanks for the review.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support given the CAs have been removed. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rougequeue de Moussier Parc national de Bou Kornine 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 22:22:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support crisp. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guépier d'Europe ichkeul128.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 21:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We don't need two so similar. If you prefer this one, can I suggest you nominate your exisitng FP for deletion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is a different image and in many cases we find in the FP galleries several FP images of the same species.. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orb weaver spider (Argiope flavipalpis) female on web Nyamebe Bepo.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 19:28:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)
Info The web decoration (Stabilimentum) of Argiope spiders changes as the females get older (and bigger). This FP looks like it's a juvenile Argiope flavipalpis. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overexposed, some part have burned out. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Christian, Poco a poco (talk) 09:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I second Christian, sorry Charles. --Zzzs (talk) 12:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baumpilz nahe Krimmerswörthsee südlich von Zeil am Main.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 17:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family : Strophariaceae
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Gallery? --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sorry, fixed. --Plozessor (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: very busy composition, but it works somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trier, 08-12-2023 (actm.) 04.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 04:11:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info Trier, view from the Petrisberg on the city of Trier. Particularly at the Cathedral of St. Peter and the Dom.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfavorable weather conditions. With the mist in the background, the main subject seems to be the white building popping up in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, per Basile. --Milseburg (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The visibility is very poor. Wolverine XI 19:57, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I thought the fog in December suited the mood of the image. But apparently I was wrong about that. Thanks everyone for the comments.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Percival Lowell by James E. Purdy.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 00:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by James E. Purdy - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination for now: lost track of number of nominations. Whoops. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez payaso común (Amphiprion ocellaris) en una anémona magnífica (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 08.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 20:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
Info Ocellaris clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Found him. --Zzzs (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fish Are Friends. Not Food. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Except sharks 🦈 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Finding Nemo? Wolverine XI 19:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light, color and carpet -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support You just found Neno! ★ 14:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-tailed Laughingthrush 0A2A2723.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 19:03:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. Bird POTY. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I concur with Charles --Zzzs (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harmonious in every way; words are actually superfluous. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Color and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking colours and composition, exceptionally detailed. --Tagooty (talk) 03:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carrie Nation by White Studio.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 17:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by White Studio - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Цветущий урюк.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: beautiful scene, but there are a few technical issues: the sky is a bit noisy and has a couple of dust spots, while the whole image is very tilted to the right. Would support if these are corrected. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is also a halo effect around the tree. --C messier (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Cosmonaut and C messier: I've fixed the tilt and a bit of noise but halo left me confused — maybe I'm stupid or it's my colour blidnness kicking in, but I don't see any. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The parts of the image around and especially below (between the foliage and the ground) the tree are unnaturally bright. --C messier (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested version @Красный, The Cosmonaut, and C messier: Dear reviewers, I have reduced the slight halo in the treetop and then adjusted the overall tonal correction accordingly. If you like the result, you can use this edit for an update. Please see the SwissTransfer link. While editing, I realized that the glow in the treetop might have been due to some overly well-intentioned post-processing. But that's just my guess. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good for me, but I'm still not sure about the halo. I just don't see it. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the halo mentioned by our fellow photographer C messier refers to the glow of the treetop that I removed in my suggestion. This can be clearly seen in a direct comparison of the two versions. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sky looks better, but the houses are still leaning to the right. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Overprocessed, like other uploads by the same author. Kind of vignetting. The center has been lightened -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greater blue-eared starling (Lamprotornis chalybaeus nordmanni) Kruger.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:17:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info Lives alongside the other blue starling recently nominated. No current FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would go for a bit more contrasty tonality, as current tonality is dream like, but still a well executed image of a beautiful bird. --C messier (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I over-brightened when I uploaded the second version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I was planning on nominating this. Thank you. --Zzzs (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Iridescent plumage -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Άγιος Μηνάς, Φηρά 0069.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info The church of Agios Menas, Fira, Santorini. All by C messier. -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Tilted? Yann (talk) 10:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore,1858) - Pale Wanderer.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{Oppose}}~~ Sorry, but maybe this one: File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore, 1858) - Pale Wanderer.jpg presents more realistic colors of the same butterfly. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't think is FP quality, but there doesn't seem to be any issue with the colour of this male Harlock81. It seems that this butterfly shows colour-variation, possibly seasonal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake, I thought the two pictures were taken at the same place, the same day. Thanks for pinging me --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is good but not exceptional, composition is routine compared to FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree, furthermore the environment is not so appealing Poco a poco (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oeste do Faial.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 03:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: aerial view of west Faial taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Can't find any "wow" in this image. --Zzzs (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Train de maintenance des voies de chemin de fer - Metlaoui - Tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:52:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A classic Kabelleger's style! ★ 18:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not really; never seen one of his like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this is a protected area of Tunisia for WLE 2024? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I said "style". ★ 19:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ;Gorges de Selja Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: noise level is a bit high, I think; would support if denoised. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I wasn't paying attention, I fixed that :) Skander zarrad (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: much better --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral The people captured in the picture aren't doing anything interesting. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The people don't bother me. —Bruce1ee^talk 08:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is the white balance OK? It looks like it has a slight yellow-greenish tint. --C messier (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to check this at home, I'm traveling, thank you for the remark Skander zarrad (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Interesting but the compo is not convincing to me. I fail to find wow here, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sphingonotus sp - Haddej - tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Orthoptera
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice camouflage! ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM --Zzzs (talk) 04:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:London Big Ben Inner Clock Face 1070925-PSD.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 14:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info created and uploaded by Ermell - nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual close-up view of the Elizabeth Tower's clock face (aka Big Ben). -- ★ 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not convinced we should have this nice image as an FP as the clock face was recently restored and looks very different. I other words, it's one of many versions but not a particularly notable one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very sharp, good composition. even if the clock changed, why not featuring it before the change? Yann (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For a perfect encyclopedia, we should ideally have one FP of every version of the clock face on such a notable building. What a great timeline that would make for the article. This excellent photo is a good start. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file name and description could helpfully indicate it is a historical image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The info and reference have been added to the description on the file page. It's up to Ermell to perhaps add the "as of 2009" to the file name when the nom is done. --Cart (talk) 15:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support El Golli Mohamed 14:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: per Yann. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom ArionStar. Ermell (talk) 05:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bummer that this image is outdated since the clocks were painted dark blue, but still good nonetheless. --Zzzs (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at it from the bright side: The new clock face is there to be photographed any day now, this historic face can't be photographed again. Do you call a photo of Manhattan with the Twin Towers outdated or an historical documentation that we are lucky to have? --Cart (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domplatz 11 in St Poelten (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 12:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of course… ★ 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image and certainly QI/VI but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing light and fair composition, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosy garlic Radès beach.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 07:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family:Amaryllidaceae (Allium roseum)
Info created by Smailtn - uploaded by Smailtn - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gephan Bhaga Gemur Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 00182.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 05:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Gephan range towering (elev. 8,000 ft (2,400 m)) above the Bhaga river, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great landscape for me --Famberhorst (talk) 12:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is not so good, for "one of the best pictures of the site". Hazy. The shadows are too dominant in the mountains, especially at the left. Harsh light. It's almost a contrejour, since the shadows seem to be leaning in our direction. Incidentally lack of sharpness in the corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin: Thanks for your comments. I have tweaked the exposure and shadows, plus mild sharpening. Is it better? Note that the direction is to the south, the sun is shining out of the top left corner. At high altitude, lighting tends to be harsh owing to the clear air. Tagooty (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin: Sorry, my edits accidentally got undone before export from LR. The latest version now has the exposure and sharpness adjustments. Please review this. Tagooty (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor change. I don't see much improvement, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. --Kadellar (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met (73879).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 01:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info The final room of the "Camp: Notes on Fashion" exhibit at The Met in 2019. At this point in the exhibit, the narrow corridors open up to this large, two-floor spectacle of wild ensembles. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Φάρος Μελαγκάβι 7382.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 10:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece
Info created & ploaded by C messier - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Attractive, balanced composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Πολύ όμορφο, φέρνει αναμνήσεις El Golli Mohamed 22:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Time could be diferent. --Mile (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely! --Zzzs (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination Tomer T. --C messier (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faial Caldera panorama3.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 00:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Faial Caldera, Azores. Better shadows compared to the previous nomination; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love this landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Violet-backed starling (Cinnyricinclus leucogaster verreauxi) female.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 22:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The striking male violet-backed starling is already an FP. I don't think the plain female merits FP. --Tagooty (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical! Tagooty (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пик Талгар заповедник.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 14:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! Henrysz (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Breathtaking image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ★ 18:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly Oversaturated colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pisa - Cattedrale da Battistero 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 06:36:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info created and uploaded by Luca Aless - nominated by ★ -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support User:Luca Aless 17:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morena estriada (Echidna nebulosa), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-25, DD 47.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
Info Snowflake moray (Echidna nebulosa), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of genus Echidna. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry infortunate crop, we can't see the whole fish. This black thing is disturbing, also the sharpness is not so good.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have applied a slight crop to the right bottom corner, so that what I believe is a feather star (black thing), is not on the way. Even if that could be an improvement, I don't see what is wrong with the crop, morays live in holes and rarely go out during the day as they are nocturnal predators. I also have to say that this animal is rare, and probably that's the reason why we have no FPs of the whole genus. That conditions to take pictures under water are more challenging than over the water is something that I don't need to elaborate, I guess. --Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support The whole moray would be be too big to fit in the image, so I will assume the author meant to only picture its head. The crop is fine. The black thing is ~~mildly~~ not distracting. The bottom of the moray where it turns is a bit blurry, probably OoF. Take my opinion with a grain of salt, as I am not a professional photographer. --Zzzs (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a full body image of this species for comparison. Also, isn't it pretty clear the author only wanted to picture its head? --Zzzs (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The crop is good and intentional; hope this is not an FPC revenge vote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have little doubt after reading the same words I used "Infortunate (sic) crop" in my review. That's an statement that doesn't speak for the reviewer. Again, we have no FP of the genus Echidna, but we have already 4 FPs of the species (not genus) Himantopus himantopus. I've definitely supported more images that I've opposed of El Golli Mohamed, so I have no personal issue here and no problem with the photographer, let alone free-license photographers. If I'm convinced, I support the image if not, I oppose, that has nothing to do with whom is behind the camera and in most of the cases people believe that and are thankful for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't we have the right to criticize, otherwise it's a revenge vote? Is it a dictatorship here? Is the justification for my vote true or not? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course anyone may criticise and oppose; that is the essence of FPC. But El Golli Mohamed was banned from Commons in April for two weeks for insulting behaviour stemming from his revenge votes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear reviewers, normally I am not a fan of repeating old mistakes, but regarding the incident mentioned here again, I would like to refer to the recent discussion from late May/early June. I agree with Poco a poco that we should please focus only on the images and not on the photographer behind the camera. Only through constructive discourse can we work together in a meaningful and healthy way. Behind every username there is a person who has to be respected, no matter if we have a different opinion or not. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support High level of detail for an underwater picture. Interesting close up and the light is fine -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miltiades (Roman replica).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 10:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info Miltiades (Roman replica). My shot. --Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Renomination, i have feeling this is FP. Citate from one who use it few days ago "Is the best image on the internet, very clean and high resolution." Nothing to add. Made few improvements.-- Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giacomo Francia, San Sebastian, Google Arts and Culture.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 08:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
Info This artwork was made by Giacomo Raibolini, aka Giacomo Francia. He was the son of the more famous artist Francesco Francia, well known as a goldsmith and painter and a close friend of Raphael. This is an author belonging to the mannerism of the late Italian Renaissance. The exact date of the painting is not known, but it can be attributed between 1520 and 1540, when it was influenced by the painter Dosso Dossi, another mannerist tending towards the Venetian Renaissance. This picture is important because shows a Mannerism offspring from the Italian Renaissance. It is worth noting the resemblance of the Saint Sebastian depicted with his [father] to whom he was extremely devoted. The artwork was imported from Google Arts and Culture stitching 7880 tiles. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Uploaded another version just to verify the artwork, in case the ZoomViewer tool is not working or you cannot download the original file due to its size. Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure! --Yann (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portland, Oregon, in 1898 - Herbert A. Hale.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 05:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Herbert A. Hale - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo. -- Karelj (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean? Tedder (talk) 22:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's incredibly good quality for 1898. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Adam Cuerden's comment --Llez (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose VI since there is historical value, not FP since there is no wow. --Milseburg (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)

Tue 25 Jun → Sun 30 Jun
Wed 26 Jun → Mon 01 Jul
Thu 27 Jun → Tue 02 Jul
Fri 28 Jun → Wed 03 Jul
Sat 29 Jun → Thu 04 Jul
Sun 30 Jun → Fri 05 Jul

Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)

Thu 20 Jun → Sun 30 Jun
Fri 21 Jun → Mon 01 Jul
Sat 22 Jun → Tue 02 Jul
Sun 23 Jun → Wed 03 Jul
Mon 24 Jun → Thu 04 Jul
Tue 25 Jun → Fri 05 Jul
Wed 26 Jun → Sat 06 Jul
Thu 27 Jun → Sun 07 Jul
Fri 28 Jun → Mon 08 Jul
Sat 29 Jun → Tue 09 Jul
Sun 30 Jun → Wed 10 Jul